I
have been on a quite a few online email lists over the last 7 years
or so, basically since they first came out. From the original Jeep-L
list to the XJ-list to the Rockcrawler.com board, a common question
comes up time and time again. No, I’m not talking about “how
big a tire can I fit” or “which tire is better.”
I’ll save those questions for the opinion section of everyone
else’s website. I’m referring to the age-old question
of “which fastener grade should I use?”
It seems that everyone
has an opinion on which grade is better but not many people can
or will tell you why. Well, I’d like to explain the technical
difference between a SAE Grade 8 (Grade 8) and a SAE Grade 5 (Grade
5) fastener.
Most people think a
bolt is a bolt is a bolt. They see it as a machined chunk of metal
that holds or attaches things. Fasteners (aka bolts or screws)
are complex mechanically-engineered hardware. They are made using
different materials, different thread types (i.e. coarse, fine,
extra fine), various lengths, with grip or no grip (shank), different
types (i.e. hex, 12 pt, carriage, etc.), different coatings (i.e.
passivated, cadmium, dry film lube, etc.), various classes of
fit (i.e. class 3), and multiple grades (i.e. grade 5, 8, etc.).
Bolts come with left
or right hand threads, metric or SAE threads, different number
of threads per inch (i.e. 20 or 28 for the same size fastener)
and various versions of those (i.e. UNF versus UNJF). In addition,
there are way too many military specs in existence to list them
all here. So with all these differences, it’s no wonder
most people don’t understand the difference between fasteners
very well. Of all these differences, I’ll focus on the different
grades since that is what most shade tree mechanics ask about.
First,
you need to be able to identify bolts by the different grades
when you go to the local hardware store. Grade 5 bolts have 3
marks or lines on the head that are in the shape of a “Y”.
Grade 8 bolts have 6 marks on the head.
Second, the different
grades have a meaning to them. It tells you how strong the fastener
is. There are different types of strengths listed for each grade.
Proof strength (about 90% of yield), ultimate tensile strength
(bolt fails in stretch), yield strength (bolt begins to get a
permanent set and changes cross-sectional area typically) and
shear strength (bolt prevents parts from separating by using it’s
shank or body as a stop).
Depending
on how you are using the fastener, you would look at the appropriate
and corresponding strength type. For example, bolts that attach
a D-ring bracket to the bumper face of a vehicle would be critical
in tension . So you would want to know what the tensile strength
a particular bolt is. Bolts that attach winch-mounting plates
are typically seeing mostly shear loads thus preventing the winch
from departing from the vehicle during winching operations. In
that case, shear strength is important to you.
Mark’s Standard
Handbook for Mechanical Engineers lists Grade 5 fasteners
as 120 ksi fasteners. This means the tensile strength is 120,000
lbs per square inch. It also lists Grade 8’s as 150 ksi
fasteners meaning the tensile strength is 150,000 lbs per square
inch. Also, the ultimate shear strength of a fastener is typically
about 60% of its ultimate tension strength. So given a certain
diameter (cross-sectional area) and strength rating, someone can
figure out how much load that fastener can carry in both tension
and shear.
Example of bolts under single shear load |

Example of bolts under tension |
Let’s look at
an example of where grade 5 and grade 8 bolts are subjected to
single shear loads (winch plate reference).
Using a .250-inch
diameter grade 8 fastener gives you
the following shear capability:
A
= Cross-sectional area of the fastener size (since bolt bodies/shanks
have circular cross-sections, use area of a circle) = Pi x r2 where
R (radius) = .250/2 = .125, therefore A = Pi x (.125)2 = .0491
square inches (in2)
Capability
in shear = 91,000 lbs / in2 x .0491 in2 = 4468
lbs
Using
the same .250-inch diameter grade 5
fastener results in the following:
Capability
in shear = 75,000 lbs / in2 x .0491 in2 = 3683
lbs
That’s a difference
of over 750 lbs or over 1/3 ton. In this example you can clearly
see that using a grade 8 fastener has a superior advantage over
the grade 5. Therefore the result is if someone is using grade
5 bolts in a shear application like the winch plate example, they
will fail almost 800 lbs earlier.
I’ve also heard
the argument that grade 8’s are more brittle than grade
5’s and that’s why you shouldn’t use them. Well,
first you need to understand what the term “brittle”
really means. Brittleness in bolts is defined as failure at stresses
apparently below the strength of the bolt material with little
or no evidence of plastic deformation. Typically, fasteners are
not brittle below 180 ksi ultimate tensile strength. Grade 5’s
have an ultimate tensile strength of 120 ksi and a grade 8 fastener
has an ultimate tensile strength of 150 ksi. This is why brittle
is a relative term. Nearly all fasteners are considered ductile
except some made from PH 15-6 Mo, 17-4 PH and 17-7 PH.
Going back to the D-ring
on the face of the bumper example, you would want to know its
tensile carrying capability. Calculating the tensile capability
is not as easy as shear since the thinnest portion of the bolt
is at the minor diameter of the threads (bottom of the thread
“V”). So you need to know the nominal minor diameter
of that particular fastener. That’s where military specification
MIL-S-8879C comes in. It is titled “Screw threads, controlled
radius root with increased minor diameter, general specification
for”. It lists that and a lot more for almost all possible
fasteners. MIL-S-8879C lists the nominal minor diameter of a .2500-28-UNF
at .2065 inches. We can now calculate the A (area) of the cross-section:
A = Pi x r2 = Pi x (.2065/2)2
= .03349 in2
Grade 8
bolt capability in yield (stretch) = 130,000 lbs / in2
x .03349 in2 = 4354 lbs minimum
Grade
8 bolt capability in tension (failure) = 150,000
lbs / in2 x .03349 in2 = 5024
lbs minimum
Grade
5 bolt capability in yield (stretch) = 92,000
lbs / in2 x .03349 in2 = 3081
lbs minimum
Grade 5 bolt capability
in tension (failure) = 120,000 lbs / in2 x .03349 in2 = 4019
lbs minimum
Again, you can see
that the grade 8 will support over 1000 lbs more or a 1/2-ton
more. But there’s something more important to note. The
grade 5 fastener has already reached its ultimate load and FAILED
BEFORE the grade 8 starts to yield or stretch. Therefore, the
argument that you should not use grade 8’s because they
are more brittle than grade 5’s is not a true statement
in most applications.
Toughness is an important
feature of a fastener. It is the opposite of brittleness and gives
you an idea of how it will handle abuse without being damaged
and eventually weakening the fastener or can cause fatigue to
appear much earlier than normal. One way to “measure”
toughness is by looking at the hardness rating of a fastener.
The higher the number (Brinell, Rockwell …) the harder the
material is and the tougher it is to damage. According to Marks’
Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Grade 5’s
typically have a core Rockwell hardness of C25-C34 whereas a grade
8 typically has a core Rockwell hardness of C33-C39. Based on
this, grade 8’s are tougher than grade 5’s.
Fatigue usually doesn’t
play a big part in grade 8 or grade 5 fasteners since most steels
are good for 2 million to 10 million cycles. Far more than you
will ever winch or pull on. Here is a quick point about fastener
fatigue. Almost all fastener fatigue failures are the result of
improper (almost always too low) torque. Too low a torque will
cause the fastener to pick up more load more often and eventually
cycle it to failure. Therefore, you want to make sure you torque
your fasteners to the appropriate level using a torque wrench
and make sure to torque dry, clean threads. Lubricated threads
significantly change the actual preload on the fastener and you
risk over torquing it.
Due to space
and time limitations, here is a chart showing you the tension
and shear minimum capabilities of different grade fasteners relative
to their size.
| |
SAE
Grade 5 |
SAE
Grade 8 |
ARP
Fastener |
SPS
Fastener |
MS14181 |
SPS
Fastener |
| Ultimate
Tensile Capability of Fastener (ksi) |
120 |
150 |
160 |
180 |
220 |
260 |
| Ultimate
Shear Capability of Fastener (ksi) |
75 |
91 |
95 |
108 |
132 |
156 |
| Fastener
Diameter |
Typical
Material |
Med
Carbon
Steel |
Med
Carbon
Alloy Steel |
A286
CRES |
A286
CRES |
Inconel
718 |
MP35N
Super Alloy |
| in. |
thrds/in |
| 0.1640 |
32 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
1468 |
1835 |
1957 |
2202 |
2691 |
3181 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
1584 |
1922 |
2007 |
2281 |
2788 |
3295 |
| 0.1900 |
32 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
2169 |
2711 |
2892 |
3253 |
3976 |
4699 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
2126 |
2580 |
2694 |
3062 |
3743 |
4420 |
| 0.2500 |
28 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
4007 |
5009 |
5340 |
6010 |
7347 |
8682 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
3682 |
4470 |
4660 |
5300 |
6480 |
7660 |
| 0.3125 |
24 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
6440 |
8050 |
8590 |
9660 |
11807 |
13953 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
5750 |
6980 |
7290 |
8280 |
10120 |
11970 |
| 0.3750 |
24 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
9888 |
12360 |
13180 |
14830 |
18127 |
21423 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
8280 |
10050 |
10490 |
11930 |
14580 |
17230 |
| 0.4375 |
20 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
13338 |
16673 |
17780 |
20010 |
24453 |
28899 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
11270 |
13680 |
14280 |
16240 |
19840 |
23450 |
| 0.5000 |
20 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
18139 |
22674 |
24190 |
27210 |
33255 |
39302 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
14730 |
17870 |
18650 |
21210 |
25920 |
30770 |
| 0.5625 |
18 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
23028 |
28785 |
30700 |
34540 |
42218 |
49894 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
18640 |
22610 |
23610 |
26840 |
32800 |
38770 |
| 0.6250 |
18 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
29218 |
36524 |
38960 |
43800 |
53568 |
63307 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
23010 |
27920 |
29150 |
33130 |
40500 |
47900 |
| 0.7500 |
16 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
42726 |
53408 |
57000 |
64100 |
78331 |
92573 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
33130 |
40200 |
42000 |
47700 |
58300 |
68900 |
| 0.8750 |
14 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
58434 |
73043 |
77900 |
87700 |
107129 |
126607 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
45100 |
54700 |
57100 |
64900 |
79400 |
93800 |
| 1.0000 |
12 |
Tension
Capability (lb) |
75968 |
94961 |
101300 |
114000 |
139275 |
164598 |
| |
Shear
Capability (lb) |
58900 |
71500 |
74600 |
84800 |
103700 |
122500 |
These examples show
how much of a load can be carried by the fastener BUT you need
to make sure the parent material is strong enough to handle the
loads, as well, otherwise it will fail. Industry practice is to
apply a safety factor to address any unknowns and/or combined
load cases to give you an adequate margin of safety.
Another good point
to make is to never reuse fasteners after they have been subjected
to loading or the elements. Corrosion can cause a fastener to
fail well below its initial strength. So be smart and use only
new fasteners when installing or reinstalling some cool new widget
on your rig.
Getting back to the
original question, “which fastener grade should I use?”
I hope it’s very clear by now that grade 8 fasteners are
far superior to grade 5 fasteners. If this is so, then why do
the automotive manufacturers use some grade 5 fasteners? The automotive
OEM’s use what it needs to be safe and nothing more since
there is a difference in cost between grade 5 and grade 8 (or
metric 8.8 and 10.9). Since the OEM’s manufacture millions
of vehicles each year, the difference in a few cents per fastener
adds up to a lot for them. However, as an individual who has spent
some serious coin on a winch or lift kit, I wouldn’t let
the few cents difference in the cost of a grade 8 versus a grade
5 fastener make up my mind as to which fastener I would use.
We have a saying where
I work that seems an appropriate answer to this age-old question.
“When in
doubt, make it stout!”
 |
Based
near Denver, Colorado, David Potter is a new technical writer
here at Rockcrawler.com and is also the
proud new owner of the Project TJ "Mad Cow." David
is a genuine rocket engineer for Lockheed Martin.
Contact
David at dpotter@rockcrawler.com |
|